What the Maersk Red Sea Diversion Taught Procurement — And What the Hormuz Crisis Makes Urgent
When Maersk suspended its Red Sea transits on 2 January 2024, the assumption across most procurement functions was that the disruption would be temporary. Two years on, the Cape of Good Hope diversion remains the default route for Asia–Europe container shipping, the cost base has structurally reset, and a second chokepoint — the Strait of Hormuz — has entered crisis. For procurement professionals, the question is no longer whether maritime disruption is a real risk. It is whether the lessons from the first crisis were learned before the second one arrived.
The Red Sea diversion added approximately 3,500 nautical miles and 10–14 days to Asia–Europe voyages, raised fuel consumption by roughly 33%, and cut Suez Canal transits by half — from over 26,000 ships in 2023 to 13,213 in 2024 (Euronews; US DIA). The Shanghai Containerized Freight Index surged 274% above January 2023 levels by July 2024. These were not temporary surcharges. They were structural cost shifts, and organisations that built 2025 category strategies on pre-2024 benchmarks found those strategies quietly overstating savings.
The industries that got hit hardest
The disruption was not evenly distributed. Approximately 70% of components used in the European automotive industry are transported from Asia via the Red Sea (S&P Global). Tesla suspended production at its Berlin Gigafactory for two weeks in early 2024, losing an estimated 5,000–7,000 vehicles. Stellantis resorted to air-freighting parts at significant premiums. Retailers including IKEA, Walmart, and Home Depot experienced delivery delays on seasonal stock — spring clothing and patio furniture missed selling windows entirely.
In food commodities, wheat shipments fell almost 40% in the first half of January 2024, and Robusta coffee prices rose 9% to a 16-year high (Infor). J.P. Morgan Research estimated the disruptions could add 0.7 percentage points to global core goods inflation during the first half of 2024, with effective global container shipping capacity reduced by approximately 9%.
Contract language failed faster than operations
Maersk’s operational decision to divert came within weeks of the first serious Houthi attacks. Its commercial framework — the Transit Disruption Surcharge, contract amendments, and customer communications — lagged by several weeks. Legal commentators have noted that force majeure clauses drafted for pandemic-era risks did not clearly cover security-driven route diversions (International Trade Insights). The surcharge governance question — who decides, on what notice, with what cap — became the most contested ground between carriers and shippers.
The practical lesson is that contract review cycles must now include explicit wording on route diversion scenarios, surcharge governance, and fallback mechanisms when freight indices themselves become unreliable during volatility spikes.
Schedule reliability collapsed — and is still recovering
Global schedule reliability dropped to 50–55% throughout most of 2024 and into January 2025, according to Sea-Intelligence. It has since recovered to 62.4% at the start of 2026 — a meaningful improvement, but still well below the 70–80% range shippers expect. Maersk has been the most reliable of the top-13 carriers, reaching 78.1% in November 2025, partly reflecting its Gemini Cooperation hub-and-spoke design. But the industry-wide average tells the real story: reliability remains structurally lower than before.
Then Hormuz happened
In February 2026, Iran effectively blocked the Strait of Hormuz following US and Israeli military strikes. Ship transits collapsed from roughly 130 per day to just 6 — a 95% drop (CNBC; Wikipedia). The strait carries approximately 25% of the world’s seaborne oil and 20% of global LNG trade (U.S. EIA). Brent crude surged 10–13% immediately. Container lines including Maersk, CMA CGM, and Hapag-Lloyd suspended Hormuz transits, compounding the Red Sea diversions already in effect.
Container Magazine described this as a “dual chokepoint crisis without precedent in modern container shipping.” More than 44,000 businesses across 174 economies had at least one shipment exposed, with small and micro-businesses comprising 80% of those affected (UNCTAD). Iran has since threatened closure of the Bab el-Mandeb strait as well — if both closed simultaneously, approximately one quarter of the world’s energy supply would be blocked (Al Jazeera).
What this means for practitioners
Three actions are worth doing in the next quarter, regardless of sector. First, audit freight and logistics contracts for force majeure, surcharge governance, and index fallback wording — these were the single biggest point of failure in 2024. Second, rebuild total-cost-of-ownership models against actual 2024–2026 cost data rather than pre-disruption baselines. Third, stress-test carrier and supplier concentration against a scenario where both the Red Sea and Hormuz chokepoints are simultaneously disrupted — because that scenario is no longer theoretical.
Short-horizon levers — inventory buffers on critical SKUs, dual or triple carrier allocations, and mode flexibility — delivered measurable results faster than long-horizon structural changes like nearshoring. Sequencing matters: stabilise first, redesign second.
The Red Sea diversion will eventually end. The Hormuz crisis may too. The procurement functions that will be best placed are those extracting the full set of lessons now — not waiting for the next disruption to test whether they were ready.
Download the full Procurement Spectrum Red Sea Diversion & Hormuz Crisis Research Report — free at procurement-spectrum.com.
Subscribe to our newsletter for regular procurement intelligence and free resources.